11.08.05
The French riots: an American on the sidelines
One thing about having a blog is that now I feel required to comment whenever something big happens around me.
First off for anyone that knows me personally: I’m fine. I feel safe. Nothing has happened in my arrondissement nor in the arrondissements of the universities I attend.
After the jump: An American student’s view of the riots in and around Paris.
You may have heard by now that the rioting has finally entered the city of Paris, specifically the 3rd and 17th arrondissements. I knew it was only a matter of time for the kettle to boil over and for Paris to experience this situation firsthand. How do I feel, with these sorts of events happening within walking distance? frightened? angry at the fact that it happened during my lovely semester abroad? No. Truthfully, I feel like a spectator. The violence isn’t directed at people, really, except for the police. The violence is directed at a society and a state rife with an unspoken sort of racism. This is the same cycle that lots of ethnic groups (though it seems to be blacks above all, since 1945) go through or have gone through in European or European-descended societies (such as the United States). The transition from slave to full citizen was completed a long time ago, but full social acceptance in many places has still not been realized. Racial profiling by police, longer seating times at restaurants, extra airport security checks… it’s the same thing black people deal with in the US. I haven’t done the necessary research to really expound on racism in Europe and the United States, but I can’t help seeing the current riots as a smaller and later version of the race riots in the United States. Luckily for us, we had a strong, nonviolent leader for the civil rights movement in Martin Luther King to focus the frustration and anger of the population.
While the people here aren’t fighting for civil rights legislation, they are, in this humble student’s opinion, motivated by the same factors as those of the American movement. They don’t want to be thrown out into the banlieus [suburbs] to be forgotten in housing projects, just like the poor, black citizens of New Orleans, they want someone to address their problems. Sarkozy isn’t doing that. Villepin might. Now, let’s not get ahead of ourselves: the efforts to restore order are very important, but Sarkozy hasn’t said a word (unless I’ve missed a quote) about really solving the problem. Villepin has. These suburbs face the same problems all of France does, one might argue, but it has been reported that the proportion of these problems is much higher in these areas.
“Immigrants and their offspring make up 10% of France’s population, but many are without French citizenship and the right to vote. They also suffer the highest rate of unemployment, and their relations with the police are generally difficult or hostile…”
(Quoted from a BBC article)
However, despite all the arguments on that side of the issue, violence is violence. I haven’t decided yet whether violence is never the right way for the people to be heard (what if there is repression, state violence, etc?), but I will say that it would require very extreme circumstances to be at all valid. The youth of France could have made itself heard in other, more peaceful ways. There is also something to be said about 14 year-olds being allowed to stay out well into the early morning by their parents. There are faults on all sides of the issue. What needs to happen is that, now that the world is giving attention to the rioters, for the violence to stop and for some real attention be given to their problems. I wish a Martin Luther King would appear from one of these communities and channel the anger and frustration of the rioters in a more constructive way. If this doesn’t happen, I fear any concessions these people will get will be weak tea, while the world’s attention fades, and the problem is only temporarily quieted.
I’ve talked much about finding a “real solution” to the problem. It is very easy to say that, but social ills are especially difficult to combat because they reside in the minds of people. It will be a long, slow process to fix this situation and all the French government can really do at this point is show the people that it’s willing to undertake such a large task in the long run. Public works and beautification projects in the banlieus, afterschool programs for elementary and highschool students, diversity programs in schools not just in the banlieus… this is the direction I see as best suited to a real solution, which I’d estimate to be complete after a two generations. Old ways of thinking die hard. For all this, of course, I give about a .0003563% chance in hell of happening, but it’s nice to dream.
End the violence. Find a real solution. Listen to your people.
-Vic
Note: If any readers do not find the terms “blacks” or “black people” sufficiently politically correct, you have my sincere apology; those terms were simply the easiest to use to maintain a higher level of readability (“peoples of African descent” is a bit bulky).
A similar opinion (that I read after writing this post) can be found at Alternet. Alternet, I find, is rather leftist. Then again, so am I.
Retskcin said,
November 9, 2005 at 4:12 am
Point the First
” Sarkozy isn’t doing that. Villepin might. Now, let’s not get ahead of ourselves: the efforts to restore order are very important, but Sarkozy hasn’t said a word (unless I’ve missed a quote) about really solving the problem. ”
From what I understand, preriots Sarkozy was very pro Affirmative action for ethnic minorities in France.
Here is a 2004 article from the NY Times dealing with it…
http://www.genocidewatch.org/FranceMuslimAffirmativeActionJanuary15.htm
I don’t know what his opinion is now, but I imagine his long run solution would include AA?
Just putting this in because leftists are awfully harsh on Sarkozy. While I am unsure about Sarkozy’s policy stance now, in hindsight his thoughts on AA seem much more prescient than Chirac or Villepin.
A Second Point
The comparison to race riots such as those in the US in the 60’s 70’s, seems obvious in this situation. However, the historian in me feels obliged to point out that historical analogies shouldn’t be pushed very far.
As Vic points out, black protests began peacefully and were organized from the top by the SCLC and such. They did not degenerate into riots until there was frustration at the lack of progress the U.S. Government was making which led to frustration in the U.S. political process.
In the situation in France, the protest movement has started more sporadically. Which leads to an obvious question (which someone who is studying french government should be able to answer
)
In what ways have these immigrants sought political representation?
If they do indeed inhabit areas in large concentrations why do they not have representation from those regions?
Why haven’t political leaders sprung up amongst immigrants?
In America ~12% of the population is African American, and while some might argue they are under represented (or some overrepresented) undeniably, they are a political force. One could say in the 50’s despite a similar demographic, they were not. BUT in the 50s racism was institutionalized and socialized to a degree that is not comparable to the situation in France.
Seems to me, the riots represent a failure in both the French economic and political system.
So whats the deal? Apathy? Not enough education? Belief in the government?
Rascism?
I’ll come back to this once I get a bit more knowledge about the subject, but what do you guys think?
number9 said,
November 9, 2005 at 10:08 pm
While it is true I have studied the French government (it was more like a rush to shove a book in my head before the final, even without waiting to the last minute), I have not studied French political history deeper than a general tour of the rise and fall of major political parties and the greater influences of certain important leaders. Thus, I can’t really tell you how immigrants have sought political representation.
I’m currently in a class regarding France’s relationship with francophone countries (Senegal, Morocco, etc), so there may be some discussion of such a thing in that class, but I can’t say for sure.
I think the deal is mostly frustration: French politics have been historically only for the elite of French society and racism doesn’t help the situation. If I remember correctly, things have gotten somewhat easier in the past 30 years, but I may be mixing it up with British political history… sorry to be so here-and-there about it.
I’ll throw the link you sent me into the conversation: http://oxblog.blogspot.com/ (Patrick Belton)
For anyone else reading: this guy really seems to know what he’s talking about.
-Vic
aalleexxx said,
November 12, 2005 at 3:03 am
Yes of course you are not going to burn in cannes which is situated in south-west of France as every american people know! lol